- 1/15, Editorial, Washington Times, Exposing Uncle Sam’s Internet snooping
- 1/14, Zack Whittaker, CNET, Secret document on FISA snooping law released — sort of
- 1/14, Scott Shane, New York Times, Senator Asks to View Files on Killings of Americans
- 1/14, Michel Martin, NPR, Guantanamo Bay Still Unresolved
- 1/14, Deborah Charles, Reuters, Senate committee to hold February 7 hearing for Brennan as CIA nominee
- 1/14, Tom Lyons, Herald-Tribune, Police drones aren’t a paranoid fantasy
- 1/13, Daniel Ellsberg, Huffington Post, Secrecy and National Security Whistleblowing
Archive for January 15th, 2013
Bigelow and Ortiz are each scapegoats, focal points for debates forced by the failures not of individuals, but of entire institutions.
Two tragic events last Friday have prompted heated debate about torture, secrecy, freedom of information, and prosecutors run amok. But are critics assigning blame where due, or merely where convenient?
And is the convenient option too charitable, letting powerful systems of oppression off the hook in favor of scapegoating only the most visible perpetrators?
First (only because it’s an anniversary and was therefore predictable) was the 11th year of military detention at Guantánamo Bay, where prisoners under US control have endured torture–and in some cases, been murdered in custody while their deaths have been presented in public as suicides.
The military detention scheme at Guantánamo has existed for over a decade, but the use of torture remains clouded in secrecy.
In the middle of the raging healthcare debate in 2009, the one thing Congress could agree on was giving the Pentagon authority to hide evidence of its own criminal trail. Even though multiple courts ordered our government to release photos and videos held by the Pentagon that document widely implemented torture policies, that substantial body of criminal evidence remains secret to this day.
One of President Obama’s key appointments to the Justice Department was stalled for a year, before being withdrawn, because she committed the heresy of suggesting that DOJ actually enforce the law by prosecuting officials for human rights abuses.
Ultimately, Obama’s decision to resign accountability for torture ensured that discredited warmongers remained in Washington, where they continued their assault on the Constitution. A year ago, they secured a law extending military detention powers into the US, even beyond the Bush administration’s wildest dreams.
What do we know about torture? Apparently, only what Hollywood tells us.
Kathryn Bigelow’s controversial film Zero Dark Thirty supplies the public with plenty of facts (whether real or imagined) to fill the vacuum. Is it a work of fiction? A documentary? A Rorschach test?
Legions have rightly criticized Bigelow’s depiction of torture, lambasting the filmmaker’s careless insinuation that torture was ever useful (which it wasn’t) and reminding moviegoers that even if it was, it would remain illegal. Many have distributed flyers at theaters (like this one that we designed at BORDC) or chosen to boycott her work in awards ceremonies.
But who are the real culprits? Is it Hollywood’s fault that the public remains in the dark?
Three particular figures have gotten off especially easy–first when they committed crimes, again when they left government to return to positions of influence instead of prison cells, and yet again as Bigelow draws fire for depicting their crimes. Dick Cheney, John Yoo, and Ninth Circuit Judge Jay Bybee are the former officials who authorized torture in the first place, hid their illegal decisions from the American public, and then lobbied to avoid accountability for their universally abhorred crimes.
Bigelow is no hero. But it’s not her fault that the American people don’t have enough facts to recognize her movie as fiction.
Why haven’t reporters been allowed to read the Senate’s 6,000 page, bipartisan report slamming torture? Blame that on the Obama administration. Or better yet, raise your voice and demand that the facts be allowed to speak for themselves.
Then came heartbreaking news of Aaron Swartz’s suicide.
A bona fide genius and dedicated public servant, Aaron did more for the world in his 26 years than most people do in a lifetime. (Full disclosure: my colleagues and I at BORDC often collaborate with Demand Progress, the advocacy organization that Aaron co-founded.)